Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-02-06

STATE OF HARYANA vs DHARAM SINGH .

Citation / case number
SC 2003/27392
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF HARYANA
Respondent
DHARAM SINGH .
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
ARIJIT PASAYAT,MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Punjab and Haryana High Court's order granting promotional increments to respondents lacked legal basis, as they were already receiving the higher pay scale of Masters prior to promotion. The Court emphasized that granting an additional increment would result in double benefit, which is impermissible under the principles established in State of Haryana v. Partap Singh (2006 (10) SCC 251). The matter was remitted to the High Court for fresh consideration of the applicability of the precedent to the current facts.

STATE OF HARYANA vs DHARAM SINGH . · Niyam