Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-02-19

C.I.T.,Jalandhar vs Rajiv Bhatara

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2009 SC 646
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
C.I.T.,Jalandhar
Respondent
Rajiv Bhatara
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Mukundakam Sharma, Arijit Pasayat

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, confirming that surcharge on undisclosed income is not leviable for searches conducted prior to 1.6.2002, as per the amendment to Section 113 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized that the amendment does not have retrospective effect, thus supporting the Tribunal's ruling that the surcharge was improperly imposed by the Assessing Officer. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower court's interpretation of the relevant provisions of the Act.

C.I.T.,Jalandhar vs Rajiv Bhatara · Niyam