Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-02-11

Ashok Sharma vs Ram Adhar Sharma

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2009 SC 625
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Ashok Sharma
Respondent
Ram Adhar Sharma
Author
Tarun Chatterjee
Bench
V.S.Sirpurkar, Tarun Chatterjee

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to allow the production of a document under Order XVI Rule 1 and Rule 1-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, which the trial court had initially refused. The Court clarified that the term 'production' does not restrict a witness from producing documents at a later stage if justified, thus establishing that procedural flexibility exists in civil proceedings. The appeal against the High Court's order was dismissed, affirming the High Court's interpretation of the procedural rules.

Ashok Sharma vs Ram Adhar Sharma · Niyam