Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-02-18

Commr.Of Income Tax,Dibrugarh vs Doom Dooma India Ltd

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2009 SC 365
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Commr.Of Income Tax,Dibrugarh
Respondent
Doom Dooma India Ltd
Author
S. H. Kapadia
Bench
H. L. Dattu, S.H. Kapadia

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of 'depreciation actually allowed' under Section 43(6)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, determining that for the assessment years in question, only 40% of the depreciation should be deducted from the opening 'written down value' of assets used in the tea business, rather than the 100% claimed by the Assessing Officer. The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, which was based on the precedent set in Commissioner of Income-tax v. Suman Tea and Plywood Industries (P) Ltd., affirming that the calculation of depreciation must align with the proportion of income chargeable under Section 28. The appeals by the Department were dismissed, affirming the lower court's ruling.

Commr.Of Income Tax,Dibrugarh vs Doom Dooma India Ltd · Niyam