Martin F. D' Souza vs Mohd. Ishfaq

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission under Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, affirming that the appellant doctor failed to provide adequate medical care to the respondent, who was suffering from chronic renal failure. The Court established that medical professionals have a duty to ensure proper treatment and cannot discharge patients against medical advice without ensuring their safety. The appeal was dismissed, reinforcing the standards of care expected in medical practice.