Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-02-11

M. Gopalakrishnan vs State By Addl. S.P. Cbi, Bs&Fc Bangalore

Citation / case number
AIR 2009 SUPREME COURT 2015
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M. Gopalakrishnan
Respondent
State By Addl. S.P. Cbi, Bs&Fc Bangalore
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Mukundakam Sharma, Arijit Pasayat

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the absence of sanction for prosecution under Section 197(1)(a) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, renders the cognizance taken by the court illegal when the accused is a public servant. The Court emphasized that the requirement of sanction is crucial to protect public servants from frivolous prosecutions, and the prosecution's argument that the issue could be resolved during trial was rejected. Consequently, the Court quashed the proceedings against the appellant, reinforcing the necessity of obtaining proper sanction before initiating prosecution under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

M. Gopalakrishnan vs State By Addl. S.P. Cbi, Bs&Fc Bangalore · Niyam