Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-02-11

State (Govt.Of Nct Of Delhi) vs D.A.M.Prabhu & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2009 SUPREME COURT 1891
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State (Govt.Of Nct Of Delhi)
Respondent
D.A.M.Prabhu & Anr
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Asok Kumar Ganguly, Arijit Pasayat

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the provisions of Section 10 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, which allows for the prosecution of individuals in charge of a company for violations, were applicable in this case. The Court found that the High Court erred in quashing the proceedings against the respondents, as they were deemed liable under the Act for the violations committed by Swatanta Bharat Mills. The judgment of the Delhi High Court was set aside, and the matter was remanded for further proceedings against the respondents.

State (Govt.Of Nct Of Delhi) vs D.A.M.Prabhu & Anr · Niyam