Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-02-25

Saroj Anand & Ors vs Prahlad Rai Anand & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2009 SC (SUPP) 2797
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Saroj Anand & Ors
Respondent
Prahlad Rai Anand & Ors
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
S.B. Sinha, V.S. Sirpurkar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the implications of a counsel's statement in a partition suit under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Court held that a statement made by counsel, which was recorded by the court, binds the parties unless explicitly retracted. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision to allow partition instead of sale, emphasizing the importance of adhering to prior representations made in court. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the right to partition the joint family property.

Saroj Anand & Ors vs Prahlad Rai Anand & Ors · Niyam