Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-02-16

Commnr. Of Customs(Preventive) vs M/S. Aafloat Textiles (I) P.Ltd.&Ors.;

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Commnr. Of Customs(Preventive)
Respondent
M/S. Aafloat Textiles (I) P.Ltd.&Ors.;
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Mukundakam Sharma, Arijit Pasayat

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the CESTAT's decision regarding the Customs Act, 1962, specifically under Section 28 and Section 28AB, confirming the duty demand of Rs.6,69,40,149 on M/s Aafloat Textiles (India) Ltd. The Court ruled that the Special Import License (SIL) used for importing gold and silver was forged, thus invalidating the exemption under Notification No.117/94-Cus. However, the Court agreed with the CESTAT's finding that there was insufficient evidence to prove the importer's knowledge of the SIL's forgery, leading to a dismissal of the penalty imposed on the importer. The outcome favored the importer on the grounds of limitation and lack of knowledge.

Commnr. Of Customs(Preventive) vs M/S. Aafloat Textiles (I) P.Ltd.&Ors.; · Niyam