Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-12-18

PRITHIPAL SINGH vs SATPAL SINGH(D) TH.LRS.

Citation / case number
SC 2006/30096
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
PRITHIPAL SINGH
Respondent
SATPAL SINGH(D) TH.LRS.
Author
TARUN CHATTERJEE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision affirming the Additional Rent Controller's order to set aside an ex-parte eviction order under Order 9 Rule 13 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Court clarified that while the Additional Rent Controller lacks the power to condone delays in filing for leave to defend under the Delhi Rent Control Act, it retains the authority to set aside eviction orders once made. The appeal by the landlord was dismissed, confirming the tenant's right to contest the eviction proceedings.

PRITHIPAL SINGH vs SATPAL SINGH(D) TH.LRS. · Niyam