Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-12-16

HDFC BANK LTD vs J.J.MANNAN @ J.M.JOHN PAUL

Citation / case number
SC 2006/19707
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
HDFC BANK LTD
Respondent
J.J.MANNAN @ J.M.JOHN PAUL
Author
ALTAMAS KABIR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Madras High Court's decision granting anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to the Respondent No.1, despite allegations of cheating and forgery under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The Court emphasized that the grant of anticipatory bail is a discretionary power and must be exercised judiciously, considering the nature of the accusations and the possibility of the accused fleeing from justice. The Court found no compelling reason to deny bail, thus affirming the lower court's order.

HDFC BANK LTD vs J.J.MANNAN @ J.M.JOHN PAUL · Niyam