Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-12-03

PREETAM @ PREETAM PRASAD vs STATE OF M.P.

Citation / case number
SC 2002/19356
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
PREETAM @ PREETAM PRASAD
Respondent
STATE OF M.P.
Author
HARJIT SINGH BEDIM. PANCHAL, , ,
Bench
HARJIT SINGH BEDI,J.M. PANCHAL, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the concurrent findings of fact by lower courts, emphasizing that such findings warrant no interference unless there is a substantial error in law or procedure. The Court reiterated the principle that the appellate court should respect the factual conclusions drawn by the trial court unless they are manifestly erroneous. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the decisions of the lower courts.

PREETAM @ PREETAM PRASAD vs STATE OF M.P. · Niyam