Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-12-10

K.K. KANNAN (D) BY LRS. vs KOOLIVATHUKKAL KARIKKAN MANDI .

Citation / case number
SC 2001/4588
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
K.K. KANNAN (D) BY LRS.
Respondent
KOOLIVATHUKKAL KARIKKAN MANDI .

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court failed to comply with the mandates of Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) by not formulating a substantial question of law before allowing the second appeal. The Court emphasized that the High Court must satisfy itself that a substantial question of law is involved, formulate that question, and allow the respondent to argue against it. Consequently, the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment and remitted the matter for fresh disposal in accordance with the proper procedure under Section 100 CPC.

K.K. KANNAN (D) BY LRS. vs KOOLIVATHUKKAL KARIKKAN MANDI . · Niyam