Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-12-03

DALIP SINGH vs STATE OF U.P. .

Citation / case number
SC 2001/14127
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
DALIP SINGH
Respondent
STATE OF U.P. .
Author
G.S. SINGHVI,ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, , ,
Bench
G.S. SINGHVI,ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court emphasized that litigants who engage in falsehood, misrepresentation, or suppression of facts are not entitled to relief under Article 136 of the Constitution. Citing Hari Narain v. Badri Das, the Court reiterated the importance of truthfulness in applications for special leave, stating that misleading statements can lead to revocation of such leave. The Court also referenced G. Narayanaswamy Reddy v. Governor of Karnataka, where relief was denied due to the concealment of material facts, affirming that full disclosure is essential for obtaining discretionary relief.

DALIP SINGH vs STATE OF U.P. . · Niyam