Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-12-17

Ashok Kumar vs Ved Parkash & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2010 SUPREME COURT 330
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Ashok Kumar
Respondent
Ved Parkash & Ors
Author
Tarun Chatterjee
Bench
Tarun Chatterjee, V.S. Sirpurkar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of eviction under the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, specifically examining whether a landlord can evict a tenant from non-residential premises on the grounds of bonafide requirement. The Court held that the provisions of Section 13 of the Act, which primarily concern residential buildings, do not extend to non-residential premises, thus allowing the landlord's claim for eviction based on bonafide requirement. The appeal by the tenant was dismissed, affirming the lower courts' decisions favoring the landlord.

Ashok Kumar vs Ved Parkash & Ors · Niyam