Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-12-18

Prithipal Singh vs Satpal Singh(D) Th.Lrs

Citation / case number
AIR 2010 SC (SUPP) 249
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Prithipal Singh
Respondent
Satpal Singh(D) Th.Lrs
Author
Tarun Chatterjee
Bench
R. M. Lodha, Tarun Chatterjee

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision affirming the Additional Rent Controller's authority to set aside an ex-parte eviction order under Order 9 Rule 13 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Court clarified that while the Additional Rent Controller lacks the power to condone delays in filing for leave to defend under the Delhi Rent Control Act, it can restore such applications post-eviction. The appeal by the landlord was dismissed, maintaining the tenant's right to contest the eviction proceedings.

Prithipal Singh vs Satpal Singh(D) Th.Lrs · Niyam