Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-12-10

K.K. Kannan (D) By Lrs vs Koolivathukkal Karikkan Mandi & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2010 SC (SUPP) 194
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
K.K. Kannan (D) By Lrs
Respondent
Koolivathukkal Karikkan Mandi & Ors
Bench
P. Sathasivam, Asok Kumar Ganguly

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court failed to comply with the mandates of Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which requires the formulation of a substantial question of law before entertaining a second appeal. The Court emphasized that merely referring to grounds in the memorandum of appeal does not satisfy the requirement of formulating a substantial question. Consequently, the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment and remitted the case for fresh disposal, ensuring adherence to the procedural requirements of Section 100 CPC.

K.K. Kannan (D) By Lrs vs Koolivathukkal Karikkan Mandi & Ors · Niyam