Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-12-03

Dalip Singh vs State Of U.P. & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2010 SC (SUPP) 116
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Dalip Singh
Respondent
State Of U.P. & Ors
Bench
Asok Kumar Ganguly, G.S. Singhvi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of truth and full disclosure in judicial proceedings, stating that litigants who misrepresent facts or suppress material information are not entitled to relief under Article 136 of the Constitution. Citing precedents such as Hari Narain v. Badri Das and G. Narayanaswamy Reddy v. Governor of Karnataka, the Court reiterated that misleading the Court disqualifies a party from being heard on the merits of the case. The Court held that the special leave petitions were dismissed due to the petitioners' failure to disclose relevant facts, reinforcing the principle that justice must be sought with integrity.

Dalip Singh vs State Of U.P. & Ors · Niyam