Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-12-15

Union Of India & Ors vs Narendra Gupta & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2009 SC (SUPP) 2167
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Union Of India & Ors
Respondent
Narendra Gupta & Ors
Author
Surinder Singh Nijjar
Bench
Tarun Chatterjee, Surinder Singh Nijjar

Judgment text excerpt

The Bombay High Court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's decision granting training allowance to respondents under the D.O.P.T. letter dated 31.3.1987, rejecting the Union of India's claim that respondents were permanent faculty members and thus ineligible. The Court emphasized that the respondents were recruited as scientists under DRDO rules and not as permanent faculty of I.A.T., affirming the Tribunal's findings as legally sound. The Court dismissed the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, confirming the entitlement to the allowance from specified dates.

Union Of India & Ors vs Narendra Gupta & Ors · Niyam