Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-08-28

MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANS.CORP. &ANR. vs CASTERIBE RAJYA P. KARMCHARI SANGHATANA

Citation / case number
SC 2006/14397
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANS.CORP. &ANR.
Respondent
CASTERIBE RAJYA P. KARMCHARI SANGHATANA
Author
R.M. Lodha

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed two key issues regarding the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation's treatment of casual cleaners. It held that the Industrial Court's direction to grant permanency and benefits to the complainants was justified under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (MRTU & PULP Act), specifically under item nos. 5, 6, 9, and 10 of Schedule IV. The Court affirmed the maintainability of the complaints filed by the unrecognized union, emphasizing the nature of the work performed by the cleaners as permanent despite their casual employment status.

MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANS.CORP. &ANR. vs CASTERIBE RAJYA P. KARMCHARI SANGHATANA · Niyam