Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-08-07

MADAN KUMAR SINGH(D) THR LRS. vs DISTT. MAGISTRATE, SULTANPUR .

Citation / case number
SC 2005/17446
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MADAN KUMAR SINGH(D) THR LRS.
Respondent
DISTT. MAGISTRATE, SULTANPUR .
Author
Deepak Verma

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the appellant, as an auction purchaser, qualifies as a 'consumer' under Section 2(d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, despite the District Forum's dismissal of his complaint. The Court established that the delay in delivering possession and necessary documents for the truck deprived the appellant of its commercial use, thus constituting a deficiency in service. The Court reversed the lower courts' decisions, allowing the appeal and directing the respondents to compensate the appellant for the delay and inconvenience caused.

MADAN KUMAR SINGH(D) THR LRS. vs DISTT. MAGISTRATE, SULTANPUR . · Niyam