Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-08-27

State Of Maharashtra & Anr vs M/S Super Max Internationalp.Ltd.& Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2010 SUPREME COURT 722
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of Maharashtra & Anr
Respondent
M/S Super Max Internationalp.Ltd.& Ors
Author
Aftab Alam
Bench
Aftab Alam, G.S. Singhvi, B.N. Agrawal

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of ejectment under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947, specifically citing Section 13(1)(g) regarding reasonable and bona fide need of landlords and Section 13(3)(a) concerning default in payment of dues. The Court upheld the High Court's decision to require the appellant to deposit a monthly sum as a condition for staying the execution of the ejectment decree, emphasizing the need to balance the interests of landlords and tenants. The Court found the conditions imposed by the High Court to be reasonable and dismissed the appellant's challenge to the stay order.

State Of Maharashtra & Anr vs M/S Super Max Internationalp.Ltd.& Ors · Niyam