Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-08-11

Amar Nath Shukla vs State Of Uttaranchal

Citation / case number
AIR 2009 SC (SUPP) 2073
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Amar Nath Shukla
Respondent
State Of Uttaranchal
Author
B.Sudershan Reddy
Bench
B. Sudershan Reddy, R.V. Raveendran

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant under Section 436 IPC for setting fire to the complainant's hut, affirming the trial court's decision despite the appellant's appeal focusing solely on the sentence. The Court noted that the offence under Section 436 IPC is non-compoundable, thus rejecting the request to reduce the sentence based on a compromise between the appellant and the complainant's widow. The Court emphasized the need for deterrent punishment for such offences, leading to the dismissal of the appeal regarding the sentence.

Amar Nath Shukla vs State Of Uttaranchal · Niyam