Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-08-28

Maharashtra State Road Trans.Corp. ... vs Casteribe Rajya P. Karmchari ...

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Maharashtra State Road Trans.Corp. ...
Respondent
Casteribe Rajya P. Karmchari ...
Author
R.M. Lodha
Bench
R. M. Lodha, Tarun Chatterjee

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed two primary issues regarding the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation's treatment of casual workers. It held that the complaints filed by the unrecognised union under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (MRTU & PULP Act) were maintainable despite the union's status. The Court affirmed the Industrial Court's finding of unfair labour practices by the Corporation, specifically under items 5 and 9 of Schedule IV of the MRTU & PULP Act, and directed the Corporation to provide equal wages and benefits to the complainants as permanent employees.

Maharashtra State Road Trans.Corp. ... vs Casteribe Rajya P. Karmchari ... · Niyam