Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-08-07

S.Palani Velayutham & Ors vs Dist.Collector,Tirunvelveli,T.Nadu ...

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
S.Palani Velayutham & Ors
Respondent
Dist.Collector,Tirunvelveli,T.Nadu ...
Author
R.V. Raveendran
Bench
R.V. Raveendran, P. Sathasivam

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Lands for Harijan Welfare Schemes Act, the Collector is required to issue individual notices to 'persons known or believed to be interested' in the acquired land, which includes vested remaindermen. The Court found that the division bench of the High Court erred in ruling that the vested remaindermen were not entitled to notice simply because their names were not recorded in the revenue records. The Court upheld the decision of the Single Judge, declaring the acquisition proceedings illegal for lack of notice to the vested remaindermen, and set aside the division bench's order.

S.Palani Velayutham & Ors vs Dist.Collector,Tirunvelveli,T.Nadu ... · Niyam