Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-08-04

State Of Maharshtra vs Sayed Mohammed Masood & Anr

Citation / case number
2009 AIR SCW 6825
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of Maharshtra
Respondent
Sayed Mohammed Masood & Anr
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
Deepak Verma, S.B. Sinha

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the legality of quashing an FIR under Section 420 IPC concerning a fraudulent investment scheme by M/s City Limouzines (India) Ltd. The Court held that the High Court erred in quashing the FIR as the allegations of cheating and misrepresentation warranted investigation. The Court emphasized that the FIR should not be quashed at the preliminary stage when serious allegations are made, thus allowing the investigation to proceed.

State Of Maharshtra vs Sayed Mohammed Masood & Anr · Niyam