Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-04-24

SHARIFF AHMED vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

Citation / case number
SC 2008/14508
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SHARIFF AHMED
Respondent
STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's direction to the Investigating Officer to focus on a specific offence, such as adding Section 307 IPC, is permissible under law. The Court emphasized that the police have the statutory right to investigate cognizable crimes without judicial interference, as established in King Emperor Vs. Khwaja Nazir Ahmad and further supported by S.M. Sharma Vs. Bipen Kumar Tiwari. The Court reiterated that the judiciary's role begins only when a charge is preferred, thus upholding the High Court's decision.

SHARIFF AHMED vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI) · Niyam