Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-04-13

RAVINDRA KUMAR MADHANLAL GOENKA vs M/S RUGMINI RAM RAGHAV SPINNERS P. LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 2006/31800
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RAVINDRA KUMAR MADHANLAL GOENKA
Respondent
M/S RUGMINI RAM RAGHAV SPINNERS P. LTD.
Author
Mukundakam Sharma

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of a petition under Section 482 CrPC, affirming that the High Court correctly refused to quash a criminal complaint against the appellants. The Court emphasized that the jurisdiction under Section 482 is to be exercised sparingly and only in exceptional cases where the complaint is manifestly attended with mala fides or where the allegations do not constitute any offense. The Court found that the allegations in the complaint were sufficient to warrant further investigation and proceedings.

RAVINDRA KUMAR MADHANLAL GOENKA vs M/S RUGMINI RAM RAGHAV SPINNERS P. LTD. · Niyam