Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-04-24

SAKTI vs STATE OF A.P. .

Citation / case number
SC 2005/4510
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SAKTI
Respondent
STATE OF A.P. .
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of a writ petition by the Andhra Pradesh High Court, which sought the appointment of an officer under Section 21 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, for ensuring safety and legal aid for Scheduled Tribes. The Court clarified that the provisions of the A.P. State Commission for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act, 2003, are adequate for addressing grievances related to atrocities, and that the State and Central Acts operate in overlapping but distinct fields. The Court affirmed that the appellant could seek redress through the State Commission, thus reinforcing the framework for protecting Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes under existing laws.

SAKTI vs STATE OF A.P. . · Niyam