Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-04-15

STATE OF A.P. vs ARAVAPALLY VENKANNA

Citation / case number
SC 2003/2730
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF A.P.
Respondent
ARAVAPALLY VENKANNA
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's quashing of the FIR under Section 7(A) and Section 8(e) of the A.P. Prohibition Act, 1995, along with Section 109 IPC, was erroneous as there was sufficient material indicating the commission of a crime. The Court emphasized that the exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, should be done sparingly and only to prevent abuse of process or secure justice. The appeal was allowed, reinstating the FIR and underscoring the necessity of a trial to assess the evidence.

STATE OF A.P. vs ARAVAPALLY VENKANNA · Niyam