RAMESH BHAI vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellants under Sections 302, 120B, and 201 IPC, affirming that circumstantial evidence must establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The Court reiterated that all incriminating facts must be incompatible with the innocence of the accused. The High Court's judgment was supported by consistent precedents, confirming the trial court's findings based on the established circumstantial evidence.