Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-04-15

Baban Bandu Patil vs State Of Maharashtra

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2009 SC 288
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Baban Bandu Patil
Respondent
State Of Maharashtra
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, Lokeshwar Singh Panta, P. Sathasivam

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant under Sections 302 and 324 read with Section 34 IPC, affirming the Bombay High Court's decision while acquitting two co-accused. The Court found that the evidence presented established the appellant's active participation in the assault leading to the death of the victim, Vithoba. The judgment clarified the application of Section 34 IPC, emphasizing that common intention among co-accused can lead to joint liability for the crime committed.

Baban Bandu Patil vs State Of Maharashtra · Niyam