Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-04-17

U.P. State Sugar & Cane Development Ltd vs Raza Buland Sugar Co. Ltd. & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2009 SUPREME COURT 3018
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
U.P. State Sugar & Cane Development Ltd
Respondent
Raza Buland Sugar Co. Ltd. & Ors
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, P. Sathasivam, Mukundakam Sharma

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Allahabad High Court, affirming the trial court's ruling that certain properties were not covered by the definition of 'scheduled undertaking' under Section 2(h) of the U.P. Sugar Undertakings Acquisition Act, 1971. The Court clarified that the plaintiffs were entitled to possession of these properties, rejecting the defendants' claims of res judicata and the applicability of Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. The outcome favored the plaintiffs, allowing them to assert their rights over the specified properties.

U.P. State Sugar & Cane Development Ltd vs Raza Buland Sugar Co. Ltd. & Ors · Niyam