Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-04-24

Shariff Ahmed & Ors vs State (Nct Of Delhi)

Citation / case number
AIR 2009 SUPREME COURT 2691
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Shariff Ahmed & Ors
Respondent
State (Nct Of Delhi)
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Asok Kumar Ganguly, Arijit Pasayat

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's direction to the Investigating Officer to focus on a particular offence, specifically adding Section 307 IPC, was permissible under law. The Court reaffirmed the principle that the police have the statutory right to investigate cognizable offences without judicial interference, as established in cases like King Emperor Vs. Khwaja Nazir Ahmad and S.M. Sharma Vs. Bipen Kumar Tiwari. The Court emphasized that the judiciary's role begins only when a charge is preferred, thus upholding the High Court's decision.

Shariff Ahmed & Ors vs State (Nct Of Delhi) · Niyam