Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-04-13

Ravindra Kumar Madhanlal Goenka & Anr vs M/S Rugmini Ram Raghav Spinners P. Ltd

Citation / case number
AIR 2009 SUPREME COURT 2383
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Ravindra Kumar Madhanlal Goenka & Anr
Respondent
M/S Rugmini Ram Raghav Spinners P. Ltd
Author
Mukundakam Sharma
Bench
Mukundakam Sharma, S.B. Sinha

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of a petition under Section 482 CrPC for quashing a criminal complaint, emphasizing that the High Court's jurisdiction under this section is limited to preventing abuse of process and ensuring justice. The Court reiterated that the merits of the case should not be examined at this stage, and the allegations in the complaint must be taken at face value. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision to allow the criminal proceedings to continue.

Ravindra Kumar Madhanlal Goenka & Anr vs M/S Rugmini Ram Raghav Spinners P. Ltd · Niyam