Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2009

Supreme Court of India · 2009-04-08

Rumi Dhar vs State Of West Bengal & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2009 SUPREME COURT 2195
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Rumi Dhar
Respondent
State Of West Bengal & Anr
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
S.B. Sinha, Mukundakam Sharma

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the application of Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure regarding the criminal proceedings against the appellant for offences under Sections 120-B, 420, 467, 468, and 471 IPC, as well as under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The Court held that mere repayment of the loan and settlement with the bank does not exonerate the accused from criminal charges, emphasizing that the nature of the allegations involved criminal conspiracy which warranted the continuation of proceedings. The Court upheld the decisions of the lower courts, affirming that the criminal proceedings should not be quashed based solely on the repayment of the loan.

Rumi Dhar vs State Of West Bengal & Anr · Niyam