Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-09-23

MAN BAHADUR vs STATE OF H.P.

Citation / case number
SC 2007/60300
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MAN BAHADUR
Respondent
STATE OF H.P.
Author
S.B. SINHA,CYRIAC JOSEPH, , ,
Bench
S.B. SINHA,CYRIAC JOSEPH, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court emphasized the necessity of informing an accused of their rights under Section 50 of the NDPS Act, which mandates the option to be searched before a gazetted officer or Magistrate. The Court held that failure to communicate this right constitutes prejudice against the accused, reinforcing the principles of a fair trial as enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution. The judgment also referenced the Miranda rights from the U.S. Supreme Court, establishing that procedural safeguards must be strictly adhered to in penal matters.

MAN BAHADUR vs STATE OF H.P. · Niyam