Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-09-03

M/S J.P.SRIVASTAVA &SONS(RAMPUR)P.L&ORS vs H.K. SRIVASTAVA (D) TH. LRS. .

Citation / case number
SC 2005/17790
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S J.P.SRIVASTAVA &SONS(RAMPUR)P.L&ORS
Respondent
H.K. SRIVASTAVA (D) TH. LRS. .
Author
V.S. SIRPURKAR
Bench
ALTAMAS KABIR,V.S. SIRPURKAR, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed appeals against a Madhya Pradesh High Court judgment concerning mismanagement allegations under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act. The Court held that the petitioners must demonstrate a minimum shareholding of 10% as per Section 399 of the Act to maintain their petition. The Court emphasized the importance of amicable resolution in family disputes involving company management, ultimately upholding the need for compliance with statutory requirements for filing such petitions.

M/S J.P.SRIVASTAVA &SONS(RAMPUR)P.L&ORS vs H.K. SRIVASTAVA (D) TH. LRS. . · Niyam