Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-09-30

MURUGAN vs STATE BY PUB.PROSECUTOR, TAMIL NADU &ANR

Citation / case number
SC 2001/18798
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MURUGAN
Respondent
STATE BY PUB.PROSECUTOR, TAMIL NADU &ANR
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
ARIJIT PASAYAT,MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the appeal against the Madras High Court's judgment which set aside the acquittal of the appellant under Section 307 IPC and Section 307 read with Section 109 IPC. The Court held that the prosecution had established the case against the appellant, affirming the High Court's decision while maintaining the acquittal of the co-accused. The ruling emphasized the necessity of corroborative evidence in serious offenses and the standards of proof required in criminal trials.

MURUGAN vs STATE BY PUB.PROSECUTOR, TAMIL NADU &ANR · Niyam