Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-09-30

Saji Geevarghese vs Accounts Officer & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2009 SUPREME COURT 785
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Saji Geevarghese
Respondent
Accounts Officer & Ors
Author
R.V.Raveendran
Bench
Lokeshwar Singh Panta, R.V. Raveendran

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed a dispute regarding excess billing under the Telegraph Act, 1885, specifically Section 7B, which mandates arbitration for such disputes. The Court upheld the High Court's direction for statutory arbitration, emphasizing that the telecom department must resolve billing complaints through arbitration rather than unilateral demands for payment. The Court confirmed the validity of the arbitration process and the need for fair inquiry into the appellant's claims of excessive billing, ultimately supporting the appellant's right to challenge the bills in arbitration.

Saji Geevarghese vs Accounts Officer & Ors · Niyam