Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-09-15

K.V. Sudharshan vs A. Ramakrishnappa & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2009 SUPREME COURT 373
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
K.V. Sudharshan
Respondent
A. Ramakrishnappa & Ors
Author
Tarun Chatterjee
Bench
Tarun Chatterjee, Harjit Singh Bedi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of the appellant's suit for partition and separate possession under the Mysore (Religious and Charitable Inams) Abolition Act, 1955, affirming that the respondent No.1 had validly obtained occupancy rights over the inam lands as the Archak of the temple. The Court found that no partition had been established by metes and bounds, and the appellant's claims were not substantiated by sufficient evidence. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, maintaining the High Court's ruling.

K.V. Sudharshan vs A. Ramakrishnappa & Ors · Niyam