Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-09-25

Aslam @ Deewan vs State Of Rajasthan

Citation / case number
AIR 2009 SUPREME COURT 363
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Aslam @ Deewan
Respondent
State Of Rajasthan
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Mukundakam Sharma, Arijit Pasayat

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the accused under Section 394 IPC for robbery involving grievous hurt, affirming the Rajasthan High Court's dismissal of their appeal. The Court emphasized that Section 394 IPC entails a more severe punishment than Section 392 IPC, as it involves causing harm during the commission of robbery. The evidence presented, particularly from the injured witness, was deemed sufficient to establish the guilt of the accused, leading to the confirmation of their sentences.

Aslam @ Deewan vs State Of Rajasthan · Niyam