Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-09-08

Joginder @ Jindi vs State Of Haryana

Citation / case number
AIR 2009 SC (SUPP) 977
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Joginder @ Jindi
Respondent
State Of Haryana
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, Harjit Singh Bedi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. pertains only to non-bailable offences, and thus, a petition under this section for bailable offences is misconceived. The Court found that the High Court was unjustified in requiring custodial interrogation for bailable offences. The Court disposed of the special leave petition, allowing the petitioner to seek regular bail upon surrender, without being influenced by the High Court's observations.

Joginder @ Jindi vs State Of Haryana · Niyam