Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-09-02

Supri Advert.& Entertainment Pvt.Ltd vs Anahita Pandole & Ors

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Supri Advert.& Entertainment Pvt.Ltd
Respondent
Anahita Pandole & Ors
Author
Altamas Kabir
Bench
G.S. Singhvi, Altamas Kabir

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the legality of mobile hoardings in Mumbai, emphasizing the provisions of Sections 328 and 328A of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, and the Maharashtra (Urban Areas) Preservation of Trees Act, 1975. The Court held that permissions for hoardings must comply with statutory guidelines to prevent environmental degradation and ensure public safety. The appeal was allowed, reinforcing the need for adherence to municipal regulations regarding advertisements.

Supri Advert.& Entertainment Pvt.Ltd vs Anahita Pandole & Ors · Niyam