THE SEC.DEPTT.OF HORT.,CHANDIGARH vs RAGHU RAJ

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the lower appellate court, which found that the termination of Raghu Raj's services was invalid due to a lack of adherence to the principles of natural justice, specifically the failure to provide notice or an opportunity to be heard before termination. The Court emphasized that the imputation of unsatisfactory conduct constituted a stigma, thus requiring due process. The appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was dismissed, confirming the respondent's reinstatement and entitlement to salary and benefits.