Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-10-17

RUDRA PRATAP SINGH vs DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION .

Citation / case number
SC 2004/11758
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RUDRA PRATAP SINGH
Respondent
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION .
Author
S.B. SINHA,CYRIAC JOSEPH, , ,
Bench
S.B. SINHA,CYRIAC JOSEPH, , ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the legality of the dismissal of the appellant, a clerk at a private school, under the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, specifically referencing Section 16G. The Court held that the Deputy Director of Education acted within his rights in approving the dismissal based on serious charges of embezzlement, despite the appellant's non-participation in the disciplinary proceedings. The Court upheld the High Court's decision to set aside the recovery of a portion of the embezzled amount while maintaining the dismissal, affirming the principle that serious misconduct warrants stringent disciplinary action.

RUDRA PRATAP SINGH vs DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION . · Niyam