Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-10-21

RAVEENDRAN. K vs EXCISE INSPECTOR, VADAKARA

Citation / case number
SC 2001/14740
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RAVEENDRAN. K
Respondent
EXCISE INSPECTOR, VADAKARA
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
ARIJIT PASAYAT,P. SATHASIVAM,AFTAB ALAM, ,

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellants under Section 57A(iii) of the Abkari Act, 1967, for selling arrack containing methanol, a noxious substance. The Court emphasized that the burden of proof lies on the licensee to demonstrate that they did not mix harmful substances with the liquor, as per Sections 57 and 57A of the Act. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the lower courts' findings of guilt and the imposed sentences.

RAVEENDRAN. K vs EXCISE INSPECTOR, VADAKARA · Niyam