Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-10-20

S.Ramakrishna vs State Rep.By Pub.Prosr., H.C. A.P

Citation / case number
AIR 2009 SUPREME COURT 885
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
S.Ramakrishna
Respondent
State Rep.By Pub.Prosr., H.C. A.P
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Mukundakam Sharma, Arijit Pasayat

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for offences under Sections 376 and 342 IPC, affirming the High Court's reduction of the sentence from 10 years to 7 years. The Court found that the evidence presented, particularly from the victim and medical expert, established the commission of rape and wrongful confinement, rejecting the appellant's claims regarding the victim's age and consent. The Court emphasized that the absence of medical evidence confirming rape does not negate the victim's testimony, thereby affirming the lower courts' findings.

S.Ramakrishna vs State Rep.By Pub.Prosr., H.C. A.P · Niyam