Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-10-15

Mukul Mahto & Ors vs State Of Jharkhand & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2009 SUPREME COURT 335
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Mukul Mahto & Ors
Respondent
State Of Jharkhand & Anr
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Mukundakam Sharma, Arijit Pasayat

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the accused under Section 326 read with Section 34 IPC, affirming the High Court's reversal of the trial court's acquittal. The Court emphasized that the parameters for appeals against acquittal were not properly applied by the High Court, as it failed to consider the trial court's findings regarding the credibility of witnesses, particularly those related to the deceased. The Court concluded that the evidence presented was sufficient to establish the guilt of the accused, thereby maintaining the conviction and sentence imposed by the High Court.

Mukul Mahto & Ors vs State Of Jharkhand & Anr · Niyam