Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2008

Supreme Court of India · 2008-10-14

Commissioner Of Central Excise,Bolpur vs M/S.Ratan Melting & Wire Industries

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Commissioner Of Central Excise,Bolpur
Respondent
M/S.Ratan Melting & Wire Industries
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
K.G. Balakrishnan, Arijit Pasayat, Harjit Singh Bedi, P. Sathasivam, J.M. Panchal

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court clarified the interpretation of paragraph 11 of Dhiren Chemical Industries case, emphasizing that circulars issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs cannot override the law laid down by the Court, as per Article 141 of the Constitution. The Court held that while benefits granted under exemption notifications should not be reopened, this does not allow courts or tribunals to prioritize Board circulars over Supreme Court judgments in ongoing disputes. The decision in Collector of Central Excise, Patna v. Usha Martin Industries was explicitly overruled by the Constitution Bench in Dhiren Chemical's case.

Commissioner Of Central Excise,Bolpur vs M/S.Ratan Melting & Wire Industries · Niyam